Thank you, @blake 1Password is definitely malware. It's not open source, so therefore a typical person who is not able to reverse engineer the client every update to verify that 1. passwords are "end" to end encrypted, 2. surprise updates are not enabled, and 3. there are no backdoors for violent terrorists. Without such verification, passwords will be stolen at any time. I'd link a more in depth resource but there are several on the associated subreddit, forums, and GitHub. Unsafe.
@shane

@foxxy By this logic, you’re also saying than any and all closed-source software is to be considered malware. We both know that's so far from the truth it's not even funny, though, so I genuinely don't quite follow the thought process you've got here. Every single one of the security firms who have audited 1Password has had full access to the source code as well. If concerns about our security model are the kicker here, I totally suggest you give our whitepaper a read.

https://1passwordstatic.com/files/security/1password-white-paper.pdf

@foxxy If you've got any specific concerns to share with us, feel free to send us an email at security@1password.com and we'd be happy to chat further about things as well. 🙂

@blake Again, I'm tired of good people getting hurt. That's a nice white paper you wrote (not being sarcastic), and I like how you're open with your agile keychain format. Your security firms were paid off. We both know that I speak the truth, you're not even funny. The civil terminology here is a difference in threat model. We've both said our piece. Thanks for the platform. You can block me now and we can go back to our little balkanized corners, at least until they intersect again. Thank you.